Community Checkup

Scholarship and News Pertaining to Communities of Color

Community Checkup header image 2

Black Fathers

May 23rd, 2008 · 4 Comments

For some time now the black community has been bemoaning the lack of involvement of black fathers in the lives of their children. A recent Newsweek article spoke to this issue in the context of discussing a new book, “The Beautiful Struggle” (which looks very interesting) as well as a recent study on the topic.  From the article:

A 2007 study noted that a black father’s ability to financially contribute is one of the biggest determinants of whether he stays in the home. “There’s a host of evidence noting that men who cannot fulfill the breadwinner role often experience distress and interruptions in positive engagement in family life,” says Boston University professor Rebekah Levine Coley, who worked on the study. Low-income, low-skilled men are culturally expected not to care about being good fathers, and those who do care feel like failures when they cannot meet a definition of successful fatherhood in which being the breadwinner is the sole metric. This conundrum gives rise to the absentee father, the lion who would rather be proud than lead his pride. [Source: Newsweek]

This analysis is a fairly common one that addresses how the interaction between financial hard times and beliefs about what it means to be a father (e.g. financially supporting a family) can lead black men to be less involved.  I buy this to some extent.  I do think there are many men, black and white alike, who mostly view fatherhood as financially providing for their children.  And it is true that black men are really financially struggling.  Yet, I don’t know that this fully explains the issue or that it is the best explanation.

An element that is missing from the quoted analysis is how conflict in the mother-father relationship also can lead to one of the parents being uninvolved (usually fathers).  This kind of conflict can take a toll on both of the parents (the child too) to the point that one of them decides to just up and dip out.  Underlying this issue is a more general tension between black women largely influenced by the lens through which we sometimes view each other that is colored by negative stereotypes.  You’ve heard them before–the no-good dog father and the belligerent gold-digging mother just to name a couple.   And we must accept that there are very real elements of misogyny and male-bashing in the culture that bolster these stereotypes.

So in terms of how to best support families and kids with this issue, I question whether it would be more important to improve the financial condition of the father than to improve the relationship between the mother and father (or more generally between black men and women).  The quality of the relationship between parents and the emotional environment it creates for a child is critical and can’t be ignored.  At the end of the day kids need financial resources and a healthy emotional environment. But if I had to bet on one of the two, I’d bet it all on healthy emotional environment.

Enough with my rambling.  What’s your view on the nature of, consequences, and solutions for the black fatherhood situation?

*Shoutout to E for passing on this article.*

Tags: Black People · Culture

4 responses so far ↓

  • 1 SL // May 28, 2008 at 10:40 am

    I think the two issues are interconnected. Financial difficulties can lead to serious problems in a relationship.
    I do believe that parents should be financially responsible for their children, but that’s not enough.
    Providing child support alone does not make a good father. At the same time, emotional support is very important, but children also need the essentials in life (a roof, clothing, education, etc.)
    So while the most important thing is for children to feel loved, supported, and emotionally secure, it helps when their fathers also contribute to their development in material ways.

  • 2 Mike // May 28, 2008 at 3:30 pm

    I agree that it’s not an either or issue and that both issues are connected. I just don’t think that by improving fathers’ financial situations it would necessarily follow that they would be more involved fathers. I think it is more likely that this would happen if intervention focused on improving mother-father relationships along with effective parenting skills.

  • 3 SL // May 28, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    I see your point. Improved financial conditions don’t necessarily equate good parenting. I just think that at least trying to make a financial contribution to your children can improve mother-father relationships. I think that taking responsibility for your children is a good first step to improve mother-father relationships. But I agree with you, it isn’t an either or issue.

  • 4 Vee // Jul 14, 2008 at 9:11 am

    I just wanted to weigh in here. Improving the relationship between the mother and father involves redefining the roles of both parents. There really needs to be a reevaluation of manhood in todays modern society*. While it is socially acceptable for the man to be the main or sole provider, once he either loses that role or if he simply is not the big bread winnner. His manhood is called into question. Some times the man self esteem suffers and he doubts himself or his spouse questions his ability to be a man.

    Society at large is also not so forgiving of a man who plays 2nd fiddle to a financially powerful woman. There are too many examples to list.

    Note, misandry and misogyny goes hand in hand. It’s just interesting that the word misandry is rarely used.

    *Hmm, maybe some of the antiquated gender-based laws can be adjusted to reflect the changes in our society. Just a thought.

Leave a Comment